Water wars, oil wars, climate change, global warming, A personal view
21 Jul
I can either commute via the expressway or by taking a four lane road (East Ave) that makes its way through mostly residential neighborhoods into the downtown area where I live. It wouldn’t be a bad bike route except the fact that it has four lanes means a cyclist forces traffic in their lane to move into the left lane to pass the bike.
There is no reason to have four lanes on this road. If we took one lane and split it to make a bike lane on each side and then created a center turning lane we’d lose no driving convenience whatsoever. This would essentially only involve restriping the road to the new configuration.
Our city is criss-crossed with these four lane, 35mph arteries. A county-wide plan to create bike lanes would help change a lot of perceptions about bike commutes. We could even use them as scooter lanes for low-powered scooters with a low speed limit (20mph?).
With our winters I know there are skeptics about bike commuting. However those winters are getting shorter and fall and spring are great cycling weather periods. Competition with cars is a major factor when considering a commute. Dedicated lanes would help. They would also keep people riding on the correct side of the road (with the traffic). Riding against traffic or on sidewalks is a major safety issue because drivers don’t expect anything there.
2 Responses for "Creating Bike Lanes: reduce four lane streets to three lanes and two bike lanes"
I rode a bike to work and back in all four seasons. I did this for ten years or so and the winters in Rochester can be rough but snow and rain were far less of a danger than the idiots who really do own the road with their mean machines. I went out to the bank a couple of days ago and passed some emergency responders sliding a bicyclist into an ambulance. East Ridge Road is yet another deathtrap for cyclists. They moved a 180 year old cobblestone house off that road because they had widened the road so many times over the years that it was right next to the building. They should’ve narrowed the road and choked the traffic and left room for a bike lane.
i was up late watching cspan the other night and they were having energy committee hearings. alot of talk about wind and geothermal, not much about tidal and nothing about coal. yeah its dirty but guess who has 3 percent of the worlds oil and a vast percentage of the worlds coal. usa. so what can we do with it. well the krauts in ww2 made diesel out of it. why cant we. if we would institute a large scale manhatten project you cant tell me we cant figure out how to clean it up. a profitable company in america called headwaters has alot of the technology developed or being developed. if we spent 100 billion dollars in america hiring american scientists and engineers and workers all the money stays in america and we would develop clean american diesel fuel and vehicles, win win win for america. someone tell me why we are not doing this. other than the fact that the carlyle group and texas oilmen are running the country.l
Leave a reply