Burner Trouble- global warming and climate change from a personal perspective

Water wars, oil wars, climate change, global warming, A personal view

I try to avoid the ‘did we cause it?’ argument about global warming because there is an underlying religious context to the side of the argument that says: No way we caused it. Essentially, if the Christian Right admits that we screwed up the planet by burning too many fossil fuels then their belief in the supremacy of man will be threatened.

Read the rest of this entry »

From the novel…

Pierced.
Orlando, January 1999.
Warm moist green heat dawn. A breeze carries the scent of oleander and chlorine from the hotel pool and I can feel the light rising from behind the buildings on the resort’s campus. I am sitting on a concrete front step surrounded by tropical plants covered in heavy dew, fragrant lawns and winding crushed stone pathways. I’m waiting for a car to take me away and I am tired beyond tired; I wear my weariness like a shroud, a shroud that shrouds not only my movements but my entire outlook.
Read the rest of this entry »

Chevron doesn’t get it

In this week’s Economist, Chevron is running a series of ads on alternative fuels and sources of oil that are absurdly out of touch with reality. The first opens with this ‘amazing’ factoid:

"With current technology, one acre of soybeans yields 60 gallons of clean-burning biodiesel fuel."

Let’s think about this. Say I’m a farmer and I’m growing 100 acres of soy beans. If I turn them into fuel I’ll end up with 6000 gallons of biodiesel. At 55 gallons to the barrel, I’ll have 110 barrels of fuel. At $75 bucks a barrel I just spent an entire growing season to realize a gross of $8250. before any expenses. This makes no business sense at all unless the government is subsidizing this farmer to grow soy for fuel, which in fact is what’s going on. We’re paying huge amounts of money to generate fuel so we can sell it at a huge loss and declare ourselves to be dedicated to ‘alternatives’. Bunk!

The next ad is about Oil Sands as a source of fuel. They gloss over the fact that it not only costs more to produce than its worth, but also that it is extremely destructive to the environment.

At least British Pretroleum pays lip service to conservation and true alternatives like wind and wave power. However I don’t buy that line either.

These oil companies are not our friends, whatever they say.

It’s called profiteering

Exxon Mobil announced record earnings increases yesterday of 36% over the same quarter last year. Let’s look at this both from a global perspective and a personal one. We are in a regional war which would not be taking place were the region not oil-rich. This isn’t a theory- we’re alledgedly fighting terrorism which is funded by oil money. Remember 19 of the 9/11 terrorists were Saudis.

Oil is a commodity which means its price is driven by market conditions rather than brand quality or added value. Therefore, all things being equal, if light sweet crude rises a penny a gallon, then gas should rise exactly the same amount and oil company profits should remain steady. If they don’t and gas rises proportionately higher than an increase in the underlying cost then we are seeing additional mark-ups added, hence higher profits. If your local station does it, it’s called goudging; if ExoonMobil does it, its called profits. I call it profiteering.

Profiteering, which is illegal, is taking advantage of wartime or disaster conditions and scarcity to make higher than normal profits on a product. Our 2600 dead soldiers and the thousands of maimed and wounded soldiers and the innocent civilians dead in the middle east are the source of these profit opportunities. It is malignant. If these oil companies are willing to increase profits based on the misfortune of others then we certainly can’t expect them to care a whit about climate change, regardless of what their ad campaigns say.

Now to the personal:

Coincidentally, I filled my tank this morning at an Exxon Mobil. I paid $3.18 a gallon and the fill-up was $46. (four cylinder Honda Accord). This is about twice what I paid a year ago. These increases have decreased my ability to buy other stuff by about $45 a month or $540 a year. This loss of discretionary income takes that money out of the rest of the economy including local businesses and global businesses and puts it into burnt fuel and oil company profits. Their obscene profiteering is literally coming out of everyone else’s pockets.

And what is our government doing? Absolutely nothing.

View Martin Edic's profile on LinkedIn

categories

There are no tags associated with this blog

AdSense